On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 01:16:55PM -0400, Tony Espy wrote: > On 08/20/2015 05:20 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: > >I've been taking care of a backlog of packages that have been removed in > >Debian but not removed in Ubuntu. One of the packages that's shown up on > >the list as having reverse-dependencies in Ubuntu is obexd, whose packages > >(obexd-client and obexd-server) don't merely have reverse-dependencies, they > >have the ubuntu-touch metapackage as a reverse-dependency.
> >According to the Debian bug report (http://bugs.debian.org/772094), these > >packages are obsolete and superseded by bluez-obexd. bluez-obexd is > >available in Ubuntu, and does show itself as replacing obexd-client and > >obexd-server. Should the touch seed be changed to use bluez-obexd in place > >of obexd-{client,server} going forward from wily? Do we have test cases for > >obex support on the phone? > OBEX currently is *not* supported on the phone, so there shouldn't be any > test cases. > +1 from me on the seed change as well. Thanks, I'm going ahead with the seed change and package removal. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
