I'll ask the -release team about it tomorrow, I think it needs a tweak in
ubiquity to allow the 'M' processor and I'm not sure if they have
previously looked into  it and decided against it.

Regards,

Phill.

On 14 March 2013 17:22, Nio Wiklund <[email protected]> wrote:

> Is there a way to send this task to a developer, who would know
>
> 1. where that test is done (the source code)
>
> 2. how to do it (or pass the code to someone less skilled, but enough
> skilled to compile and try out a snippet with that particular test on
> various computers).
>
> If it is plain C or a bash or sh shellscript, I might dare an attempt at
> it, but I definitely need some handholding, above all, I have no idea
> where to find where the test is done.
>
> On 2013-03-14 12:42, Alex Janko wrote:
> > Well...I assume its in assembly or CSomething and I know neither of
> > those languages
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
> > On Mar 14, 2013, at 7:37 AM, Nio Wiklund <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> I was thinking about how to report a bug: what details to check out and
> >> explain.
> >>
> >> I think I understand what you want to do, and I think it will be
> >> possible, but, well, I've retired from programming. Nowadays I'm helping
> >> and testing. So I don't know where and how that check should be changed.
> >>
> >> But when you have something to test, I'm willing to check that it works
> >> in my Pentium M computer.
> >>
> >> On 2013-03-14 11:53, Alex Janko wrote:
> >>> We were just looking at how to possibly fix the CD loader to not
> require 7bit
> >>>
> >>> Like:
> >>>
> >>> If Pentium M {
> >>>     Skip PAE Check
> >>> } Else If (PAE=1) {
> >>>     boot();
> >>> } Else {
> >>>     paeErrorBoot();
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> Sorry O only knew how to write that out in java :)
> >>>
> >>> Sent from my iPad
> >>>
> >>> On Mar 14, 2013, at 1:17 AM, Nio Wiklund <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Phill,
> >>>>
> >>>> I have an IBM Thinkpad T42 with a non-pae Pentium M, that accepts
> 7bit's
> >>>> fake-pae. What do you need? Please specify in detail, and I'll try to
> do
> >>>> it :-)
> >>>>
> >>>> Nio alias sudodus
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2013-03-13 02:45, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> >>>>> Hi alex,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I do not have enough information to ask the developers about your
> problem.
> >>>>> We really do need a bug filing as per my earlier email to you.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Phill.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 12 March 2013 14:15, Phill Whiteside <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Oooch!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You can always grab a non-pae version and install that so that the
> machine
> >>>>>> has a (u)buntu running. Lubuntu were still certainly releasing
> non-pae
> >>>>>> versions up to 12.04 *i386 *[1] which should install on that
> machine.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Phill.
> >>>>>> 1. http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/releases/precise/release/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 12 March 2013 14:02, Alex Janko <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Not anymore, no
> >>>>>>> And my sash box just went down...for some reason when running a
> "chmod -R
> >>>>>>> 444 /var/www/dir/dir/" it decided to ignore all of that and start
> at /
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mar 12, 2013, at 10:00 AM, Phill Whiteside <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi Alex,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Have you got a version of ubuntu installed onto that computer?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Phill.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 12 March 2013 13:38, Alex Janko <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Being a noob...how do I do that exactly...link?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Mar 12, 2013, at 9:36 AM, Phill Whiteside <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> would you please raise a bug against ubiquity, open a terminal
> session
> >>>>>>>> and issue:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ubuntu-bug ubiquity
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> from the pentium M machine, I'm not too sure what the team can do
> about
> >>>>>>>> it if the machine does not advertise it, but it will allow them
> to have a
> >>>>>>>> think.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Phill.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 12 March 2013 12:34, Alex Janko <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hmm...I also notice that there is an issue with Pentium M
> models...they
> >>>>>>>>> have PAE but yet don't advertise it...is there any way to allow
> the PAE
> >>>>>>>>> ISOs to boot on Pentium M computers?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I've been told it had to do with the boot check, not an actual
> failed
> >>>>>>>>> boot
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Mar 12, 2013, at 8:29 AM, Phill Whiteside <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Lars,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> well spotted.... I thought the list of testing was a bit
> shorter, but
> >>>>>>>>> didn't spot why.... Any ways,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 12:00:20) phillw: Hi folks, has AMD64+Mac been dropped from the
> ISO's?
> >>>>>>>>>> (12:06:37) cjwatson: phillw: No change there
> >>>>>>>>>> (12:07:05) ***cjwatson fixes bug 1153992 and tries to work out
> what
> >>>>>>>>>> to respin
> >>>>>>>>>> (12:07:06) ubot2: Launchpad bug 1153992 in Ubuntu CD Images
> "Raring
> >>>>>>>>>> server and precise d-i installations fail at the clock
> configuring step"
> >>>>>>>>>> [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1153992
> >>>>>>>>>> (12:08:31) ***cjwatson sticks a notice on the iso.qa board
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> So, they're onto it :)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Phill.
> >>>>>>>>> P.S. you are allowed to ask directly on #ubuntu-release, the good
> >>>>>>>>> people on there do not bite :)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 12 March 2013 11:40, Lars Noodén <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 12.03.2013 04:53, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> 1. http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/261/builds
> >>>>>>>>>>> 2. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Testing
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I notice that there are no AMD64+Mac images.  Are we skipping
> those
> >>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>> time?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>> /Lars
> >>
>
>
> --
> Ubuntu-quality mailing list
> [email protected]
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
>
> --
> <https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
>
-- 
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality

Reply via email to