As far as I can tell, no one objected to this change. An objections if I go ahead and update the schedule?
Scott K On Wednesday, March 27, 2013 09:38:15 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: > It looks to me like, for Kubuntu, having Alpha 1 and Alpha 2 a week later > would be better. The current dates are right on top of KDE 4.11 beta 1 and > release candidate 1. If we go a week later, we can have those ready for the > milestones. > > Scott K > > On Wednesday, March 27, 2013 09:28:35 AM Pete Graner wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I updated the "S" schedule [1]. The schedule is typical and looks very > > similar to what we did for 12.10 date wise. I added the 3 opt-in > > Alphas and 1 opt-in Beta for the flavors that wish to participate. > > Additionally I added in the next vUDS as well. > > > > If there are any questions or concerns let me know. > > > > Thanks > > > > ~pete > > > > [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SReleaseSchedule > > > > > > -- > > Pete Graner - Release Engineering & QA Team Manager - > > <[email protected]> Canonical Ltd. - http://www.canonical.com/ > > > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Pete Graner <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Adam Conrad <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 04:46:36PM +0100, Daniel Holbach wrote: > > >>> I just had a look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SReleaseSchedule and it > > >>> seems like the relevant parts of it were written in September 2011. > > >> > > >> Right, this was pretty much just a template carried forward, I should > > >> go fill it in with approximate dates based on what we've done for > > >> raring (which should come close to the truth), and we can polish it > > >> later if we decide to refine things. > > >> > > >> (In light of that, if you need dates before I go edit the wiki, you > > >> can just use raring's schedule and add ~6mo, or so) > > >> > > >> ... Adam > > > > > > Its on my TODO for this week. As Adam said the current S schedule is > > > just a template. I had been waiting on the Tech Board decision [1] on > > > the release process which happened on Monday, before putting the work > > > into a new schedule. I'll have it done by EOW. > > > > > > [1] > > > http://fridge.ubuntu.com/2013/03/19/ubuntu-technical-board-looks-at-shut > > > t > > > leworths-proposal-for-release-management-methodology/ > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > ~pete > > > > > > -- > > > Pete Graner - Release Engineering & QA Team Manager - > > > <[email protected]> Canonical Ltd. - http://www.canonical.com/ -- Ubuntu-release mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
