On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote: > As far as I can tell, no one objected to this change. An objections if I go > ahead and update the schedule?
Scott, Go for it. ~pete > > Scott K > > On Wednesday, March 27, 2013 09:38:15 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: >> It looks to me like, for Kubuntu, having Alpha 1 and Alpha 2 a week later >> would be better. The current dates are right on top of KDE 4.11 beta 1 and >> release candidate 1. If we go a week later, we can have those ready for the >> milestones. >> >> Scott K >> >> On Wednesday, March 27, 2013 09:28:35 AM Pete Graner wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > I updated the "S" schedule [1]. The schedule is typical and looks very >> > similar to what we did for 12.10 date wise. I added the 3 opt-in >> > Alphas and 1 opt-in Beta for the flavors that wish to participate. >> > Additionally I added in the next vUDS as well. >> > >> > If there are any questions or concerns let me know. >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > ~pete >> > >> > [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SReleaseSchedule >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Pete Graner - Release Engineering & QA Team Manager - >> > <[email protected]> Canonical Ltd. - http://www.canonical.com/ >> > >> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Pete Graner <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Adam Conrad <[email protected]> > wrote: >> > >> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 04:46:36PM +0100, Daniel Holbach wrote: >> > >>> I just had a look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SReleaseSchedule and it >> > >>> seems like the relevant parts of it were written in September 2011. >> > >> >> > >> Right, this was pretty much just a template carried forward, I should >> > >> go fill it in with approximate dates based on what we've done for >> > >> raring (which should come close to the truth), and we can polish it >> > >> later if we decide to refine things. >> > >> >> > >> (In light of that, if you need dates before I go edit the wiki, you >> > >> can just use raring's schedule and add ~6mo, or so) >> > >> >> > >> ... Adam >> > > >> > > Its on my TODO for this week. As Adam said the current S schedule is >> > > just a template. I had been waiting on the Tech Board decision [1] on >> > > the release process which happened on Monday, before putting the work >> > > into a new schedule. I'll have it done by EOW. >> > > >> > > [1] >> > > http://fridge.ubuntu.com/2013/03/19/ubuntu-technical-board-looks-at-shut >> > > t >> > > leworths-proposal-for-release-management-methodology/ >> > > >> > > Thanks >> > > >> > > ~pete >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Pete Graner - Release Engineering & QA Team Manager - >> > > <[email protected]> Canonical Ltd. - http://www.canonical.com/ > > -- > Ubuntu-release mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release -- Pete Graner - Release Engineering & QA Team Manager - <[email protected]> Canonical Ltd. - http://www.canonical.com/ -- Ubuntu-release mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
