Heck, I wish you guys on -release would actually get an agreement that could be written into a simple, short, wiki page such as https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Activities/ImageTesting maybe then when we are building https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Activities you may may contribute so we all all know, instead of screaming when we get some thing wrong :)
Regards, Phill. On 13 August 2013 05:10, Adam Conrad <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 04:06:26AM +0100, Phill Whiteside wrote: > > > > the netboot ISO's are a peculiar build, in that they arrive from debian > > until we go debian-freeze. As and when they arrive, it does take a little > > while for the ubuntu system to catch up....Colin can explain this in much > > more detail. But when I last asked, I was told that they arrive from > debian > > and we expect them then appear as they do from 'up-stream'. The netboots > > are not on automated rebuild and simply arrive when upstream (debian) > > approves them. > > None of this is true. The mini.iso is built from the debian-installer > source package, but that has nothing to do with importing from Debian, > except for the name. We upload it regularly in Ubuntu, and carry a > massive local delta for it. The one that's currently in -proposed was > uploaded by me earlier today. > > They're not built daily, they're built every time we upload d-i, which > is fairly often (whenever kernel ABIs change, or when we change other > d-i components, etc). > > ... Adam > -- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
-- Ubuntu-release mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
