Hi, maybe the
*:)* got filtered out? but not to worry. I'm more interested in having my mis-conceptions corrected, as without that I will continue to mis-inform people. He who does not screw up now and again accomplishes nothing :D .... Regards, Phill. On 13 August 2013 05:45, Jackson Doak <[email protected]> wrote: > Everyone calm down. My question was answered, we've al llearned > something, and we've got two things for the to-do list.] > 1. Make the tracker wait for the images to be ready > 2. Make a wiki page > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Phil, > > > > It's a pretty simple concept. You mis-remembered Debian instead of > Debian > > Installer. It's not a major mistake, but your extended chain of > incorrect > > inferences from that small mistake are all yours. Don't blame the > release > > team. Your defensive reaction makes it even worse. Instead of blaming > > everyone else, how about just accepting you screwed up. > > > > Scott K > > > > On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 05:23:38 Phill Whiteside wrote: > >> Heck, > >> > >> I wish you guys on -release would actually get an agreement that could > be > >> written into a simple, short, wiki page such as > >> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Activities/ImageTesting > >> maybe then when we are building > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Activities > >> you may may contribute so we all all know, instead of screaming when we > get > >> some thing wrong :) > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Phill. > >> > >> On 13 August 2013 05:10, Adam Conrad <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 04:06:26AM +0100, Phill Whiteside wrote: > >> > > the netboot ISO's are a peculiar build, in that they arrive from > debian > >> > > until we go debian-freeze. As and when they arrive, it does take a > >> > > little > >> > > while for the ubuntu system to catch up....Colin can explain this in > >> > > much > >> > > more detail. But when I last asked, I was told that they arrive from > >> > > >> > debian > >> > > >> > > and we expect them then appear as they do from 'up-stream'. The > netboots > >> > > are not on automated rebuild and simply arrive when upstream > (debian) > >> > > approves them. > >> > > >> > None of this is true. The mini.iso is built from the debian-installer > >> > source package, but that has nothing to do with importing from Debian, > >> > except for the name. We upload it regularly in Ubuntu, and carry a > >> > massive local delta for it. The one that's currently in -proposed was > >> > uploaded by me earlier today. > >> > > >> > They're not built daily, they're built every time we upload d-i, which > >> > is fairly often (whenever kernel ABIs change, or when we change other > >> > d-i components, etc). > >> > > >> > ... Adam > -- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
-- Ubuntu-release mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
