On 14/06/16 20:32, Brian Murray wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 06:34:42PM +0100, flocculant wrote:
copied to release list
On 14/06/16 18:27, Paul White wrote:
...snip ...Who, if anyone, looks at the *Ubuntu* test results? That was
all i was really asking.
I can't answer that question of course :)
I don't look at information in the ISO Tracker until around Final Beta,
however bugs that are entered into the ISO Tracker do get tagged
'iso-testing' and I look at those bugs which have tasks about packages
which my team cares for regularly. Additionally, while people may not
look at the test results themselves the bugs reported from conducting
those test are useful.
--
Brian Murray
Perhaps the issue here is -
if 'bug' is not a flavour issue e.g. mousepad for Xubuntu, leafpad for
Lubuntu, Kate for Kubuntu, but something more generic like
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1577540
or
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clock-setup/+bug/1587555
How does someone from a flavour looking long before Ubuntu have started
looking at Final Beta get these things looked at?
I actually pinged Mathieu on irc re first, second was originally a
ubi-console bug, shortly after doing so he had worked it out, sorted a
fix then landed it.
While I've got the time to do that - no guarantee that some 'can' fix it.
Also - if we leave these issues to Ubuntu's Final Beta - does that not
mean there's a massive backlog of generic issues that flavours have
found in the preceding months?
(That does not imply in any way that when 'flavours' find things those
things are lefr - they aren't. There just seems to be no automatic
method here)
regards
Kev
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
