On 06/14/2016 03:32 PM, Brian Murray wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 06:34:42PM +0100, flocculant wrote:
copied to release list

On 14/06/16 18:27, Paul White wrote:
...snip ...Who, if anyone, looks at the *Ubuntu* test results? That was
all i was really asking.
I can't answer that question of course :)
I don't look at information in the ISO Tracker until around Final Beta,
however bugs that are entered into the ISO Tracker do get tagged
'iso-testing' and I look at those bugs which have tasks about packages
which my team cares for regularly.  Additionally, while people may not
look at the test results themselves the bugs reported from conducting
those test are useful.

--
Brian Murray


I think Brian's viewpoint is correct. Teams won't be looking at the tracker itself until Final Beta when the first test milestone is dropping. That said, bugs are always appreciated. Flocculant is correct in pointing out many of the image level bugs cross flavors, so it is a good idea to keep in touch when you spot them, and file bugs regardless. Bugs remain the common denominator and teams will continue to triage them as needed. The defects summary is useful for this:

http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/defects

As always, if you find a critical bug isn't getting attention after some time, feel free to raise it. Otherwise, it's best to expect teams to be developing at this point in the cycle, and the bug may idle for a bit.

Nicholas

--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release

Reply via email to