https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#New_upstream_microreleases says: "In other cases where such upstream automatic testing is not available, exceptions must still be approved by at least one member of the Ubuntu Technical Board."
So if the SRU team determine that a proposed new upstream microrelease SRU does not meet the testing requirement, we still need to get a TB member's +1. This bit for gjs just now[1]. My conclusion is that the TB had previously already granted the +1, so I documented it[2] and proceeded on that basis. But it means that do end up with "MREs" that must be documented since otherwise they do not meet the current SRU policy as it is written. I thought I'd point this out, as it seems like a surprising result of the current SRU policy, especially given that all the previously documented TB-approved MREs were removed when the policy was changed. Is this all intentional? Or should I be handling these differently? Robie [1] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1698553 [2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#GNOME
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Ubuntu-release mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
