On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 11:50:51AM +0100, Robie Basak wrote: > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#New_upstream_microreleases > says: "In other cases where such upstream automatic testing is not > available, exceptions must still be approved by at least one member of > the Ubuntu Technical Board." > > So if the SRU team determine that a proposed new upstream microrelease > SRU does not meet the testing requirement, we still need to get a TB > member's +1. > > This bit for gjs just now[1]. My conclusion is that the TB had > previously already granted the +1, so I documented it[2] and proceeded > on that basis. > > But it means that do end up with "MREs" that must be documented since > otherwise they do not meet the current SRU policy as it is written. > > I thought I'd point this out, as it seems like a surprising result of > the current SRU policy, especially given that all the previously > documented TB-approved MREs were removed when the policy was changed. > > Is this all intentional? Or should I be handling these differently?
I'm not sure this will answer your questions but here is pitti's announcement email from the time the changes were made: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2015-September/001152.html I looked at this transition a bit ago and felt like it could use some clarification. -- Brian Murray -- Ubuntu-release mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
