Hello, On 04/21/2018 04:15 AM, flocculant wrote: > One quick question here - imagine that :) > > Given that we all (apparently) find it hard to get people testing during > the 3 days we currently get at milestone's - why are we carrying on with > that same tight schedule? You'll know the way this happens - it's the > end of the testing session and suddenly someone is asking for help > looking at their images for some reason. > > If we are going to just organise sections of time amongst ourselves > during these new periods - why not do away with "weeks" and actually > have a week - a real week. If we can't manage to organise amongst > ourselves for longer than a couple of days then I think we should all > pack up and do something else ;)
That works for me. We can work out the fine specifics when we get closer (I have a couple of things in mind that I'd like to iron out first), but I'm not opposed to making it weeks instead of "weeks". > If not, then all that's really been accomplished here is making life > easier for Canonical (not that I disagree with us doing that I hasten to > add), we as flavours are gaining nothing. This isn't really making things easier for just the Ubuntu Release Team. Even if we still kept to a strict schedule, we don't have to worry about people testing with old installs (see my point to Oliver about the "pristine" ISOs). Thanks for the email. -- Simon Quigley tsimo...@ubuntu.com tsimonq2 on freenode and OFTC 5C7A BEA2 0F86 3045 9CC8 C8B5 E27F 2CF8 458C 2FA4
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Ubuntu-release mailing list Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
