On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:20:14AM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > To enable control flow protection (Intel CET) we need to kick of ABI > transition for libffi and libnettle, because trampolines / shadow > stack changes there change abi along with other changes that happened.
> libffi transition means rebuild of ruby python php haskell > llvm-toolchains guile.... > I guess we should have opened with libffi transition, but oh well. > Is it ok to proceed with libffi transition? It will be disruptive, due > to rebuilds triggering autopkgtests of all languages with bindings > effectively. And there's already a libnettle transition ongoing in -proposed. Is that this one, or is it an unrelated one we should dump? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Ubuntu-release mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
