On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 01:31, Steve Langasek <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 05:28:17PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:20:14AM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > > To enable control flow protection (Intel CET) we need to kick of ABI > > > transition for libffi and libnettle, because trampolines / shadow > > > stack changes there change abi along with other changes that happened. > > > > libffi transition means rebuild of ruby python php haskell > > > llvm-toolchains guile.... > > > > I guess we should have opened with libffi transition, but oh well. > > > > Is it ok to proceed with libffi transition? It will be disruptive, due > > > to rebuilds triggering autopkgtests of all languages with bindings > > > effectively. > > > And there's already a libnettle transition ongoing in -proposed. Is that > > this one, or is it an unrelated one we should dump? > > Well, the nettle transition is entangled with the haskell transition, so > maybe not.
The current libnettle transition has CET enabled, which i got going anyway. It looked small. -- Regards, Dimitri. -- Ubuntu-release mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
