Mark, Of course, of course... Maybe I sounded like I was criticizing Canonical for that, but I wasn't. When your resources have some kind of limit you have to make choices.
I'm also considering trying KVM on my solutions. Cheers, Leandro. 2008/4/11, Mark Goldfinch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Leandro, > > Leandro Pereira de Lima e Silva wrote: > > > I think that Canonical's choice for KVM have already made it clear that > > they won't support Xen at least for a while. > > > > I think Canonical's decision to support KVM reflects the level of > complexity involved between the two solutions.. > > Also given that Xen is moving closer to complete support within the > mainline kernel reflects a major milestone which KVM has already achieved.. > > I suspect Canonical just doesn't have the dedicated resources required to > do complete support of Xen within their support program. This isn't > necessarilly a reflection of their desire to support Xen, another example > would be Sun not having native support of Xen within customer shipped > versions of Solaris yet.. > > Thanks, > Mark. > > -- Leandro Pereira de Lima e Silva
-- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
