I don't know if everyone has seen, but there is a proposed patch for the hardy-xen-network problem here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/218126
Apparently, it's due to a bug in netfront driver. People are reporting success with the fix provided by Takahito Hirano. I'll test it here soon. Cheers, Leandro. 2008/4/11, Leandro Pereira de Lima e Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Mark, > > Of course, of course... Maybe I sounded like I was criticizing Canonical > for that, but I wasn't. When your resources have some kind of limit you have > to make choices. > > I'm also considering trying KVM on my solutions. > > Cheers, Leandro. > > 2008/4/11, Mark Goldfinch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Leandro, > > > > Leandro Pereira de Lima e Silva wrote: > > > > > I think that Canonical's choice for KVM have already made it clear > > > that they won't support Xen at least for a while. > > > > > > > I think Canonical's decision to support KVM reflects the level of > > complexity involved between the two solutions.. > > > > Also given that Xen is moving closer to complete support within the > > mainline kernel reflects a major milestone which KVM has already achieved.. > > > > I suspect Canonical just doesn't have the dedicated resources required > > to do complete support of Xen within their support program. This isn't > > necessarilly a reflection of their desire to support Xen, another example > > would be Sun not having native support of Xen within customer shipped > > versions of Solaris yet.. > > > > Thanks, > > Mark. > > > > > > > -- > Leandro Pereira de Lima e Silva > -- Leandro Pereira de Lima e Silva
-- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
