If they want a GUI one or either way i will suggest to use Openbox, is much more light and you don't even need to use so many resource and to have a lot of packages installed on your system, so it will be much more secure, a little harder to configure and have it up, but more secure and light :D
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Nicolas Valcarcel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If they want a GUI one or either way i will suggest to use Openbox, is > much more light and you don't even need to use so many resource and to have > a lot of packages installed on your system, so it will be much more secure, > a little harder to configure and have it up, but more secure and light :D > > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Wednesday 30 April 2008 14:47, Serge van Ginderachter wrote: > > > Sander, > > > > > > ----- "Sander van Vugt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Sure, I know, you shouldn't run a graphical interface on a server. > > > > But > > > > some of my customers just want to be able to start up a graphical > > > > environment anyway. > > > > > > Why does he want that? > > > To do extra things besides the normal server roles? Then that could be > > an > > > option. To manage the server? Then Webmin might be a better option. > > > > > Webmin was removed from both Debian and Ubuntu because the way it > > manages > > configuration files is not compatible with the Debian package management > > system. Ebox is a similar system and much of it is available from the > > official Ubuntu repositories in Hardy. > > > > Scott K > > > > -- > > ubuntu-server mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server > > More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam > > > >
-- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
