> On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 06:34:51AM -0700, MJang wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2008-05-03 at 08:52 +0100, Paul Elliott wrote: > > > > I strongly believe a CLI installer should always be present > > > for any software that might end up on a server. Unfortunately it's also > > > something outside of our control. > > > > Yup, Red Hat has moved away from CLI installers too.
I can not think of a single server application that can not be installed with apt completely from the command line on Ubuntu/Devian. Likewise, I can not think of a single server application that can not be installed with yum completely from the command line on Redhat. I'm not saying they don't exist, but I would be really curious to hear an example. James -- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
