Hi Victor, On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Victor Hugo dos Santos<[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Kai-Cheung > Leung<[email protected]> wrote: > > outside this commentary, I agree que FDS is a better solution for > manager LDAP/OpenLDAP structure.
Could you be more specific about the advantages of 389 directory over openldap? One of the best ldap server (openldap) is already available in the archive and I was wondering what are the advantages of having another full-blown ldap server to maintain in addition to openldap? -- Mathias Gug Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com -- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
