On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Mathias Gug<[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Victor, > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Victor Hugo dos > Santos<[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Kai-Cheung >> Leung<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> outside this commentary, I agree que FDS is a better solution for >> manager LDAP/OpenLDAP structure. > > Could you be more specific about the advantages of 389 directory over > openldap? > > One of the best ldap server (openldap) is already available in the > archive and I was wondering what are the advantages of having another > full-blown ldap server to maintain in addition to openldap?
mmm.. I believe that the principal characteristic or advantage of 389, is the multi-master replication... this is a big advantage in high-available infrastructures. Further, most administrators have one or various front-end for administer the LDAP tree. In this case, the GUI is part official of project. bye -- -- Victor Hugo dos Santos Linux Counter #224399 -- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
