On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 18:57:49 +0100 "Toby Smithe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 2:30 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What license must a soundfont be under to make it possible for you > > to integrate it? > > Any free distribution licence is fine. For instance, I recommended the > Fluid SoundFont be MIT licensed, mainly because it was closest to what > the upstream had envisaged as "Public Domain, but please include a > copyright notice". > GPL would probably also be an option. It's inconvenient that the cc licenses are not approved by debian, the possibility to choose some terms would have been nice. I guess a cc licensed soundfont couldn't get included? Philipp -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
