On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 8:41 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 18:57:49 +0100 > "Toby Smithe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 2:30 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What license must a soundfont be under to make it possible for you > > > to integrate it? > > > > Any free distribution licence is fine. For instance, I recommended the > > Fluid SoundFont be MIT licensed, mainly because it was closest to what > > the upstream had envisaged as "Public Domain, but please include a > > copyright notice". > > > GPL would probably also be an option. > It's inconvenient that the cc licenses are not approved by debian, the > possibility to choose some terms would have been nice. > I guess a cc licensed soundfont couldn't get included?
GPL is certainly an option. I only suggested MIT as that's the one that has been used before :-) I'm not sure about the status of CC licences; I'm sure they're free enough to be included, though how Debian's stance is and affects us is unclear. If you're really keen, you could e-mail debian-legal and ask. -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
