Anyway I did the job so look at http://packages.qa.dev.stgraber.org/qatracker/milestones/225/builds/16300/testcasesit includes the live session, installation, post-installation and upgrade testcases.
Please give comments and work on the post-installation testcases. If nothing much I will import it to the ISO QA Tracker before 11th October for RC testing. Thanks len-dt and ailo for their comments and support:P Regards, Howard Chan (smartboyhw) 2012/9/30 Ho Wan Chan <[email protected]> > OK my thought about it. > > There shall be two testsuites: Installation and upgrade (per regulations). > > 1. Installation > Testcases: > 1a. Live session (copied from the normal Ubuntu live testcase, don't need > much) Importance: Mandatory > 1b. Install (ubiquity) (Integrating the existing three testcases into one) > Importance: Mandatory > 1c. Post-installation (Copied from Wiki page) Importance: Run once > > 2. Upgrade > Testcases: > 2a. Upgrade testcase (copied from existing upgrade testcase in vanilla > Ubuntu) > 2b. Post-installation (same as 1c) > > I will work on it today evening and tonight to get a preview out of it. > > BTW you guys may not understand why on Earth are there three partitioning > options. Actually Nicholas Skaggs (Canonical Community QA Manager) forced > me to change it because he wanted to use the testcases that were originally > in testcases.qa.ubutnu.com to those which are in the ISO QA Tracker. So > er...... Anyway I will integrate the three partitioning options into one > testcase so don't worry:P > > Regards, > Howard Chan (smartboyhw) > > > 2012/9/30 Len Ovens <[email protected]> > >> >> On Sat, September 29, 2012 7:43 am, Ho Wan Chan wrote: >> > BTW the next thing I am going to do is an upgrade testcase. If you look >> at >> > the ISO QA Tracker we don't actually HAVE a upgrade testcase. So I think >> > we >> > can make one for that:P >> >> We already have too many test cases... I don't think we need to >> differentiate different partitioning types. I don't think it matters if it >> is a whole disk, partition resize or manual as these things are well >> tested in vanilla and not different in any way for Studio from vanilla. If >> they are separated for record keeping as one of three (or more) But not >> all three tests mandatory. We just don't have the people to test these >> things and that part of things is _no_different_ than vanilla. All that >> matters is that there was a successful install. So if there is going to be >> an upgrade case, (means two installs as far as I can tell, 12.04 then >> upgrade) then some of these others need to go. Personally, for our >> purposes we do not need to test the resize option at all and as we are >> most likely doing it on a machine we use for other things too, the manual >> partitioning option is the safest IMO. and should be the only test case we >> worry about. >> >> So at most we should have live, install and upgrade test cases. Whatever >> the partitioning style used the install partition should be formated. I >> think that was why we were using the whole disk option before. If the disk >> is not going to be formated then it is an upgrade. >> >> I've given up on using Thunar as the default FM. tumblerd seems to hang or >> quit on mounting USB sticks and I have to kill it so I can dismount the >> stick. Nautilus works fine. >> >> >> >> -- >> Len Ovens >> www.OvenWerks.net >> >> >> -- >> Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel >> > >
-- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
