On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:36:48 +0200, Micah Gersten <[email protected]> wrote:
On 09/24/2012 10:06 AM, Kaj Ailomaa
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:36:20 +0200, Ho Wan Chan
<[email protected]> wrote:
<snip>
Actually it is the steps after installation is more
important, so you can think about what we can add, e.g. audio
testing, hardware testing...
<snip>
I think we should focus as little as possible on Ubuntu and
Xubuntu specific test cases, i.e. things that we share with
those two distros, as those are things that will be corrected
without our help.
We should keep our testcase economic, and mostly focused on
the multimedia aspects.
With whatever customization we do to the desktop, that should
be tested too, of course.
As I am not that involved in the desktop customization, I
would gladly just focus on the multimedia test cases.
Perhaps someone could look through the page and try to filter
out anything that we don't need to test (for reasons stated
above)?
I would tend to disagree here; as Xubuntu has seen bad interaction
between various programs in the past (that don't necessarily affect
Ubuntu). It would be good for Studio to run (not create) the
relevant Ubuntu and Xubuntu test cases to make sure that the shared
functionality functions properly with the Studio set of apps. Of
course, testers are free to test what they wish.
Thanks,
Micah
I feel it is a goal for Ubuntu Studio to keep customization of the desktop and the system at a minimum, and only customize that which will somehow enhance multimedia production. At least manual testing should not require testing things that are identical on other platforms. Especially since we are quite undermanned, which is something I hope could change in the future.
I made some editing to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/QuantalTestcaseUpdates/UbuntuStudioTestcase , but it's still very much under construction. |
--
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
