On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Kaj Ailomaa <[email protected]> wrote:
> ** > On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:15:30 +0200, Scott Lavender < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Ho Wan Chan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all. >> >> In #ubuntustudio today somebody asked if we should add LMMS to it. >> >> I agree we need to since it is a crucial part of the system and it takes >> only about 10 MB of disk space so... >> >> BTW I talked to Nicholas Skaggs and the final decision was to dump the >> manual partitioning and auto-resize testcases and only remain the entire >> disk one along with live session and the forecoming post-installation >> testcases. >> >> Thanks everybody >> >> Regards, >> Howard Chan (smartboyhw) >> >> -- >> Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel >> >> > I think characterizing this as "a crucial part of the system" might be > misrepresenting LMMS as I think Ubuntu Studio is quite functional in > numerous use cases. > > We should also consider how many people are asking for LMMS. If we > included every application asked for, we would easily oversize the 4gig > image. I have been worried about making everyone download extra megs (oh, > won't someone think of the bandwidth) because one person said we should > include something. > > However, I am not opposed to including it. I just want to make sure we > evaluate the inclusion on it's own merits, that we are supported a complete > work flow (i.e. there are no other applications needed to support getting > the task done), and the user demand warrants inclusion. > > I look forward to other's input. > > ScottL > > > I think it's a valid addition. > I know some people prefer this kind of applications to Qtractor or Ardour. > On their homepage they make reference to LMMS being a Linux alternative to > FL Studio. In my experience there are FL Studio people, and then there is > the other kind. > Don't use it myself, but I definitely think it fills a workflow hole for a > good portion of people. > > i found LMMS to be crashy in 10.04... and i havent used it since really. if its stable and something that others want added, im OK with that. i always thought that even if it worked and was stable, my opinion was that it was "toy-ish"... we cant include *everything* and there are some key pieces of my workflow that are not installed that i have no issues with installing on my own. however, if someone wants to host a meeting, and "vote" on the inclusion of LMMS, i'll come and participate, and not vote it down, since i have no strong opinions other than it needs to be stable. > -- > Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel > > -- MH mikeholstein.info <http://www.mikeholstein.info/>
-- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
