Anyway talk about it in R cycle...Feature Freeze is here... 2012/10/2 Mike Holstein <[email protected]>
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Kaj Ailomaa <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ** >> On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:15:30 +0200, Scott Lavender < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Ho Wan Chan <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hi all. >>> >>> In #ubuntustudio today somebody asked if we should add LMMS to it. >>> >>> I agree we need to since it is a crucial part of the system and it takes >>> only about 10 MB of disk space so... >>> >>> BTW I talked to Nicholas Skaggs and the final decision was to dump the >>> manual partitioning and auto-resize testcases and only remain the entire >>> disk one along with live session and the forecoming post-installation >>> testcases. >>> >>> Thanks everybody >>> >>> Regards, >>> Howard Chan (smartboyhw) >>> >>> -- >>> Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel >>> >>> >> I think characterizing this as "a crucial part of the system" might be >> misrepresenting LMMS as I think Ubuntu Studio is quite functional in >> numerous use cases. >> >> We should also consider how many people are asking for LMMS. If we >> included every application asked for, we would easily oversize the 4gig >> image. I have been worried about making everyone download extra megs (oh, >> won't someone think of the bandwidth) because one person said we should >> include something. >> >> However, I am not opposed to including it. I just want to make sure we >> evaluate the inclusion on it's own merits, that we are supported a complete >> work flow (i.e. there are no other applications needed to support getting >> the task done), and the user demand warrants inclusion. >> >> I look forward to other's input. >> >> ScottL >> >> >> I think it's a valid addition. >> I know some people prefer this kind of applications to Qtractor or Ardour. >> On their homepage they make reference to LMMS being a Linux alternative >> to FL Studio. In my experience there are FL Studio people, and then there >> is the other kind. >> Don't use it myself, but I definitely think it fills a workflow hole for >> a good portion of people. >> >> i found LMMS to be crashy in 10.04... and i havent used it since really. > if its stable and something that others want added, im OK with that. i > always thought that even if it worked and was stable, my opinion was that > it was "toy-ish"... we cant include *everything* and there are some key > pieces of my workflow that are not installed that i have no issues with > installing on my own. however, if someone wants to host a meeting, and > "vote" on the inclusion of LMMS, i'll come and participate, and not vote it > down, since i have no strong opinions other than it needs to be stable. > >> -- >> Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel >> >> > > > -- > MH > > mikeholstein.info <http://www.mikeholstein.info/> > > > > -- > Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel > >
-- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
