On 2016-04-01 23:13, Len Ovens wrote: > In my opinion, for production use, in most of the art creation fields. > what we have now (Blank) is the right choice. If a buisness wishes to > use their logo in a screen saver, they are already spending time > creating the images and should also make sure they choose the best > screen save for their use.
Thank you for the details and backstory, Len :) Just to be clear: i completely agree AND understand. (also the flame icon is super weird, indeed.) I turn the diaporama Screensaver on because i thinks it's a nice way to look at my photos, but that is me personally. I wouldn't want to inflict upon other by default, specially not when the computer has no photos on it :D I was just reacting without understanding the details: I didn't know those screens savers were separate from the ubuntustudio-screensaver package, and since those i am speaking about work it didn't make sense. Now it does make sense :) And since we DO have screensavers, that ubuntustudio-screensaver package is redundant apart from being broken. -- Set Sakrecoer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
