On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, at 05:43 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 17:33:36 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > >On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, at 05:21 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > >> IMHO nobody should use 'ubuntu-bug ardour' as suggested by Kaj, but > >> using a browser and logging in and reporting bugs is a good idea, in > >> addition post links to the list. > >> > > > >Let's just make it clear that this is Ralfs personal opinion, and he is > >not a Ubuntu Studio developer. > > > >We, the Ubuntu Studio developers would like you to report the bug using > >ubuntu-bug. > > But the OP should care what is send by this command line tool, most > likely the OP dislike to send credit card information and passwords. > Regarding Ardour, for Ubuntu/Debian compiled without phone home, there > unlikely is a risk, but in general, this tool is bad, since log files > could contain private data that isn't needed for a bug report. >
And if you find any such bad data, won't you let us know? Because, then we would not suggest for people to use ubuntu-bug. Alright? The data can be pretty meaningful when trying to estimate what kind of variables are in question for the person reporting the bug. Such as - which release, which kernel, and so on. So, nothing dangerous. But, again, if you can prove me wrong, please do. Otherwise, try not to confuse people, please. -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
