tisdagen den 3:e maj 2016 kl. 23:40:32 CEST, Ralf Mardorf
<[email protected]> skrev:
My apologies, a last PS:
The virtual Arturia Oberheim SEM vs a remake or the origuinal of the
original Tom Oberheim SEM analog synth. I own a real Oberheim
Matrix-1000 and a virtual Arturia Oberheim SEM. A real SEM in some
aspects is much better then a real Matrix-1000, but regarding the sound
even a real Matrix-1000, is much better than the emulation of a SEM.
A studio in the box can't win against a real studio.
Audio plugins allow to draw near to a real studio, by needing
less room and less money.
i agree to dissagree: i prefere my hardware, not for the sound, but the
interface. having dedicated knobs is a limiting factor that allows me to
navigate the infinity of sounds i can create. hw also makes me have
differently fun, which i believe is an invaluable ingredient to a hit.
(what ever a hit is if not a suggestive thing) no email notifications, no
interesting wiki page, no irc, you know, just on-switch and sounds.
however looking for facts in this type of discussion is impossible on
internet. there is an equal amount of tangible thesis and trustworthy
antithesis. and with reasons: music is a very paticular artform were every
success story is full of myths, anecdotes and taste. however, no doubt that
100% ITB studios are moving masses today. my point is that very few other
music consumer than the geeks and audiophiles chose to listen to the
reverbtail or the distortion-fuzz over listening to the track globaly and
in its context .
my 2 kronor,
Set
ps. reminds me of curtis blow: 'clap yo hands everybody, if you got what
takes!' :)
--
Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer
--
ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
