On 2016-10-02 14:49, Ross Gammon wrote: > So, I have reverted the merge of default-settings & lightdm-theme, > uploaded debdiffs to the FFE bug, and tested the theme works using or > devel testing ppa. >
Thanks Ross :) I guess Krytarik and I didn't expect the reverts to be necessary, but i take responsibility for failing to better synchronize the team efforts and I add an entry to my "why-i-need-to-learn-more-about-packaging"-list :) Anyways, now everything the -release team asks for is there and i thank you for your time and effort. Hopefully, despite being deprived of an up-loader in the team, now that we know where we stand in that regard we will be able to better anticipate this kind of situation. > Hopefully the Release Team look at it soon. It may pay to ping them > on IRC in the next day or so. I will poke them this afternoon and also try my luck in #u-devel > Later I will submit bugs so that we remember to pull Krytarik's > package merge back in for the next release. Yes, thank you! This reminds me that i need to inform you of the following piece of knowledge I've been given: You wrote in OP: >>> 2. We have updated debian/control to also provide the >>> us-lightdm-theme package. I don't think creating a virtual >>> package is appropriate here. It is probably sufficient to just >>> have breaks/replaces so that us-lightdm-theme is removed on >>> upgrade. I'm told: >> without it (Provides) and the ability to drop -lightdm-theme off the >> seed/meta >> simultaneously, 1.) the image build would start failing, and 2.) the >> meta would become uninstallable (-desktop, -core). I haven't been notified about the bug yet, so I'm assuming its underway, but it might be good to put it there so we remember. Thank you very much Ross, -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
