Done - Laney has sponsored it for us \o/
On 03/10/16 15:19, Set Hallstrom wrote:
Thanks Ross:) I guess Krytarik and I didn't expect the reverts to be
necessary
Well, I just thought that it was a smaller diff file, and easier for a
sponsor to review. We could have tried for the full transition, but
there was a risk that they would suggest deferring it until the next
release cycle.
I'm told:
>>without it (Provides) and the ability to drop -lightdm-theme off the seed/meta
>>simultaneously, 1.) the image build would start failing, and 2.) the
>>meta would become uninstallable (-desktop, -core).
Good point. I didn't think to check the impact on the metapackages. I
will add a task to the bug to remember to take care of that. Hopefully
we can cover that problem by uploading new metapackages first, but if
the builds fail for a while early in the release cycle it shouldn't
matter too much. This happens regularly anyway, when Debian do
transitions that don't take care of our seeds :-)
--
ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
