Hi Antoine,
On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 2:44 PM, ttoine <[email protected]> wrote:
>> After all, the point is to be able to install an optimised system without
>> spending a lot of time searching for all the software, plugins and
>> configurations
>
> You can do that with some metapackages, scripts, or even a tutorial. Does
> that justify the work and energy to maintain a distribution?
I suppose that's exactly the question that just came up and I'm personally
unsure if you could or not. If you can, then that might possibly even be a
better option (from my point of view at least) for the previosly mentioned
reasons by myself and Erich.
On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 2:44 PM, ttoine <[email protected]> wrote:
> Maybe this energy could be more useful to help AVLinux or KXStudio? Just
> questions, please don't see any attack here.
Unfortunately, I can't really say anything all too useful about those
distributions.
Back when I started using Ubuntu Studio 16 (or rather 15.10), there wasn't an
AV Linux release and I believe I read that the project had halted, so I was
actually suprised to read about it again so frequently on this mailing list
recently. I suppose there's a new release out, but I haven't taken a look at
it, yet.
I have briefly used KXStudio back then as well, but it just felt a bit bloated
and cumbersome (or I guess they call that "feature-rich" these days) to me from
what I remember and I found the default setup tools to be a little confusing
compared to Ubuntu Studio, although I guess they do have some more GUI options.
I haven't used it since then, but the latest ISO currently is also 14.04, which
is close to EOL or probably already EOL, if it's based on Kubuntu. I don't know
what Falk's plans are right now, but it doesn't look all that active, either.
To join forces may also be a good idea, but how that could work out, I don't
know.
--
ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
