-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The project has been around a lot longer, and as a result has IMO fewer rough edges. The team behind it was the team involved in Agnula/DeMudi. ~ What this means is that they have been doing this for a long time, predating the existence of Ubuntu. Currently they are based around Debian Etch.
Why I bring it up is that I have them in production and it has been rock solid. On the very same hardware (I have two workstations, both 939 based dual core machines) it was much more stable, particularly Ardour and jack. This is not a knock on Ubuntu Studio, they have just been doing it longer. For me it has been a far better experience out of the box. I am still hesitant to recommend Ubuntu Studio to inexperienced (with respect to Linux) users. You are correct, the projects are ridiculously similar, and there a lot of room for collaboration. Having said that, I follow this project because the rest of my machines are Ubuntu based. I do some work on my Ubuntu laptop, and this project has meant that I spend less time on my environment and more time doing what I love. Cheers, Cory K. wrote: | Gustin Johnson wrote: |> For production I am still using 64studio. You have to start qjackctl |> from the menu, but by default everything (that I use anyway) is jack |> aware. They also ship with an RT kernel by default. There are 32 and |> 64 bit variants. | | How is any of this different from Studio? | | -Cory \m/ | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIG1PiwRXgH3rKGfMRAjlhAJ484IRZGHI1QyOSiC9ghZkaSqr+lACfY3gW sTX35QonqLUD1K8OrH3M2t0= =Hagb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
