I have to say I've had the opposite experience. I'm actually tempted to upgrade all my machines to Intrepid but for the fact that I love both interfaces and would like to keep both. I'd be interested to know what you have found buggy with Intrepid
a On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Glenn Holmer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 19:57 -0800, Rafael Chacon wrote: > > Canonical releases a new version of Ubuntu every six months. As each > > new version, it is normal that the new version has fewer bugs than the > > previous one (e.g. Windows 2008 has fewer bugs than Windows Vista). > > Strongly disagree. I upgraded from 8.04 "Heron" to 8.10 "Ibex", and > found it so buggy that I actually downgraded several machines to 8.04 > (including my main box). LTS (long-term support) releases like 8.04 > will by definition always be more stable than the "let's release every > six months whether it's ready or not" versions. > > This is why I don't think it's that big a deal that the real-time kernel > is not available for Studio 8.10; I've stayed on 8.04 and been happy. > > -- > "After the vintage season came the aftermath - and Cenbe." > Glenn Holmer (Q-Link: ShadowM) http://www.lyonlabs.org > > > > -- > Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users >
-- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
