On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Ralf Mardorf <[email protected]>wrote:
> > You are ignorant! You seem to believe your own words. > ignorant? i dont appreciate that ralph. how about this, i'll use what i want for my professional needs, and you use what you want. > > Just because Ardour and other computer stuff isn't the best, it's not > bad at all. But claiming something has capabilities that it doesn't have > is nonsense. Why? Is there any reason that Ardour has to be > professional? Is there something bad with not being professional? > > I've got friends who do very interesting work and I've got friends who > do very boring work, but they are all friends. > > And it's much less important for things like Ardour. Ardour is not > professional and other audio things are professional, that's a fact, but > doesn't mean that Ardour is bad. > > Linux audio for me isn't a golden calf! I'm using Linux only for private > audio work. From time to time, very seldom, I still do audio jobs and > pardon, there is a substantial difference. > > But we are wasting our time with this discussion ;). > Cheers! > > Ralf -- MH http://opensourcemusician.libsyn.com/ http://wnclug.ourproject.org/
-- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
