Ok, thanks. For now I'll get working on an intro to the desktop (what windows are, what the launcher is, etc). In my opinion our Gnome 2 one wasn't too good, because it was overly chronological.
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 21:18 +0100, Anthony Stewart wrote: > I think a mixture of both depending on the context. > > > > We need tours to explain some of the default applications they may not > be used to. > > > We also need tours to show them around so that they know roughly what > to expect. Just simple ones showing how the ui works, telling them > where the close button is. Obvious as it sounds. > > > We also need tours showing them how to do specific tasks, without > knowledge of the program. How do they know that firefox is the web > browser? > > > If you look at the sections, user interface will be a show them > arround kind of section. > Applications will be application based, showing them round the default > apps. Although there will a question tour on how to install > applications, probably sepparated and slightly larger. > Common questions will be just that, so questions. > And the others will probably be a mix. > > > Hope this helps. > > > Regards > > > Anthony > > > On 5 July 2011 03:27, Alexander Lancey <[email protected]> wrote: > > So today I finally sat down with the intention of doing stuff > on the tour. And I had no idea where to start. > > What sort of approach are we going for with the tour's > semantics? So far it's been application based. Are we going > for question based? What's the approach? > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-tour > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-tour > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-tour Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-tour More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
