> Problem 2: > A Gnome, KDE or OpenOffice translator doesn't likes launchpad translations. > But why is that? Because launchpad does not include the development branch > of his project, instead it includes only Ubuntu's version (Many guys want to > translate via Launchpad but they can not). That is because Gnome project, > for instance, does not use launchpad for translations (we all know that) but > an average translator would like better to work on his project via launchpad > translations. The main reason is because launchpad is easier.
That LP doesn't have the development version of upstream packages are not the main reasons that I (an upstream GNOME translator) don't like working in LP. I wouldn't mind integrating a branched (and sligthly older) version of a program in both the branch and development version upstream afterwards. My main objection to working in LP is A; that it does not (yet anyway) provide a useable proofreading and feedback system and B; your problem 1. Regards Kenneth Nielsen -- ubuntu-translators mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-translators
