While the reprioritising sounds sensible, I'm not convinced about the renaming idea.
It would mean that the template name will depart from the name of the document, and as Milo pointed out, it will be longer. Is there a genuine confusion that renaming the templates would resolve? Isn't it enough that the templates are contained in different source packages which show the name of the flavour that they belong to clearly? (ubuntu-docs/add-applications, kubuntu-docs/add-applications, etc) If the problem is that Launchpad presents the name of the template in its list of available translations so that the same template name appears more than once, that is a bug in Launchpad, in my opinion, because template names across different source packages can very easily repeat themselves more than once. It would be more sensible for Launchpad to present a list of translatable packages, not templates. -- Matthew East http://www.mdke.org gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF -- ubuntu-translators mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-translators
