Actually if p...@home staff are anything to go by, I wouldn't exactly expect their website to be any good. Think..."mass breeding at the sibling level" with the rabbits and other animals they sell. Most of them die within 2 years because of health problems like cancer, deformations, etc.
Source: College teacher (part of syllabus) On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 09:28 +0100, Sean Miller wrote: > On 11 October 2010 07:58, Colin Law <[email protected]> wrote: > > It is not his own site, his initial question was worded slightly > > ambiguously. He said that he 'had a page' that failed, but did not > > mean that it was his own site. > > Ah, apologies... mis-read. > > > But you are right that the fundamental problem may be the invalid > > html. The new version of the renderer may be interpreting the html > > differently. The OP should contact the site admin and point out the > > errors on the site. > > If the petsathome site is completely awful HTML then that's rather a > sad reflection on their brand... who is to know whether the pet food > is edible, the fish being sold healthy or the staff knowledgable if > they can't be bothered to spend at least a few minutes on their > website to ensure it renders in all browsers? > > Think I'll stick with Pampurred Pets... they don't really have a > website to speak of, but at least it renders ;-) > > Sean > -- [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
