On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 13:44 +0100, Dave Morley wrote: > On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 13:28 +0100, Steve Flynn wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:18 PM, scoundrel50a <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, for now, instead of getting a Slate, I found a computer, that will be > > > better for what I need at the moment. > > > > > > The specs are:- > > > > > > Acer Aspire 5736Z > > > Pentium Dual Core CPU > > > T4500 @ 2.30 GHz > > > RAM 3.00 GB > > > 64 bit > > > Windows 7 Premium > > > > > I want to install Ubuntu, but i'm a bit concerned about the fact its > > > 64bit, > > > and having read a few peoples problems when trying to install. Just > > > wondered > > > would there be any problems with the installation with this computer? > > > > Processors have been 64 bit for quite some time now! Don't worry - > > that won't cause you a problem. > > > > With this machine, unless you're planning on upgrading the RAM in the > > future, you can jsut install the 32 bit Kernel and you won't see any > > differrence. > > > > -- > > Steve > > > > When one person suffers from a delusion it is insanity. When many > > people suffer from a delusion it is called religion. > > > I have run 64bit for a while, there are only a couple of apps that ever > play up flash and wine. Wine is now working well on Maverick and above > and Sorry about that no idea why it sent the full one and a part completed one bad evolution -- Seek That Thy Might Know
http://www.davmor2.co.uk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
