Doesn't seem that bad to me. I could agree that it's against "the spirit" of open source, but they've put a ton of time and money into promoting the brand of ubuntu and I don't think it's unreasonable for them to be wary of allowing very negative websites using that branding to go unanswered.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Grant Bowman <[email protected]> wrote: > wow! > > RT @lcafiero RT @marciahofmann: Oh, Canonical. It's silly to use trademark > law to try to silence a critic! Especially a critic who works at @EFF. > https://t.co/25ipxoHxPY > > I am not happy to read about this in this way. Thoughts? > > fyi, > Grant > > -- > Ubuntu-us-ca mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-ca > > -- -Troy
-- Ubuntu-us-ca mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-ca
