I can see both sides of the coin on this one. However, I feel that
Ubuntu should be more transparent about their search/privacy policy and
be upfront with users about having the option to disable the search
function, if so desired.
On 11/07/2013 05:07 PM, Jono Bacon wrote:
I don't think is trademark law to silence a critic. I think it is
trademark law to protect a trademark.
Was news to me though and I am checking into it.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Troy Ready <[email protected]> wrote:
Doesn't seem that bad to me. I could agree that it's against "the spirit" of
open source, but they've put a ton of time and money into promoting the
brand of ubuntu and I don't think it's unreasonable for them to be wary of
allowing very negative websites using that branding to go unanswered.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Grant Bowman <[email protected]> wrote:
wow!
RT @lcafiero RT @marciahofmann: Oh, Canonical. It's silly to use trademark
law to try to silence a critic! Especially a critic who works at @EFF.
https://t.co/25ipxoHxPY
I am not happy to read about this in this way. Thoughts?
fyi,
Grant
--
Ubuntu-us-ca mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-ca
--
-Troy
--
Ubuntu-us-ca mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-ca
--
Ubuntu-us-ca mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-ca
