Is there a way to just tack down a meeting time and then discuss in the meeting? Not everyone subscribes to this list and the discussions taking place can/will influence some people's stance on the issue at hand.
-- Trey On Nov 25, 2007 10:33 PM, Chuck Frain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not to insult anyone, but from my perspective I haven't really seen any > leader of the group from my perspective. If anyone asked, I was saying > that Aaron was the defacto informal leader from the way I saw things. > > From my angle, the US Teams Project seems to be cruising along just > fine. I like the idea of education weeks and trying to do a national > event would be fun. For those types of things I think we need a 'leader' > to coordinate the efforts. That could just as easily be done by the > project lead. Once the US has teams in each state, this project is over > as far as it's original intent. If it evolves into something else great, > but that is a discussion in and of itself (that needs to be discussed > soon from the list I've seen). > > However I don't see a leader as having any real power in a group like > this as it is really a support group more than an active group. We need > a contact so when something needs to be done from the greater community > standpoint one person can be contacted. That person has to be trusted to > make the straight forward decisions and have a regular IRC meeting for > the bigger choices. > > Joe Terranova wrote: > > Then we can discuss not having a leader at the meeting. But if we're > > only going to only have a team contact, then we should clarify what > > authority a team contact has -- that being not much at all. That lack > > of authority should be enforced, even in times of conflict. > > > > On Nov 25, 2007 11:11 PM, Aaron Toponce < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > >> Why all the politics? Let's just run the project as a project as we've > >> been doing for the past 11 months. Creating leadership positions are > >> just telling me that someone needs power to make decisions and put > >> people in their place, as there seem to be some dissensions amongst > >> members. Let's keep our focus on the core of the project- to get state > > >> locos approves, not create leaders and councils and bureaucracy. > > > -- > Ubuntu-us mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us >
-- Ubuntu-us mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us
