On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Timo Aaltonen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Bryce Harrington wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 06:56:11PM +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote: >>> We are therefore planning to upload a hybrid >>> 2.6.32 kernel containing the 2.6.33 drm backported. >> >> Btw, for bug report fiddling purposes, is there a reliable way to detect >> the drm version installed? The drm version does not show up in uname -a >> of course, and `dmesg|grep drm|grep 2\.6\.33` returns nothing (at least, >> on nouveau). >> >> (Basically I want a way to automatically distinguish between bug reports >> that were tested with the new 2.6.33 drm vs those that won't, so we can >> prioritize our attentions accordingly.) > > Isn't the kernel abi enough for that? -16 has the backport, anything > before that doesn't.
Right but its still good to know a backport from which 2.6.33.y Luis -- Ubuntu-x mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-x
