On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 03:32:05PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Timo Aaltonen <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Bryce Harrington wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 06:56:11PM +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > >>> We are therefore planning to upload a hybrid > >>> 2.6.32 kernel containing the 2.6.33 drm backported. > >> > >> Btw, for bug report fiddling purposes, is there a reliable way to detect > >> the drm version installed? The drm version does not show up in uname -a > >> of course, and `dmesg|grep drm|grep 2\.6\.33` returns nothing (at least, > >> on nouveau). > >> > >> (Basically I want a way to automatically distinguish between bug reports > >> that were tested with the new 2.6.33 drm vs those that won't, so we can > >> prioritize our attentions accordingly.) > > > > Isn't the kernel abi enough for that? -16 has the backport, anything > > before that doesn't. > > Right but its still good to know a backport from which 2.6.33.y
Fair point. Right now we have v2.6.33 straight. But I do see how we might want some finer grain record of the version. I will look at where we can expose that. -apw -- Ubuntu-x mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-x
