On 07/06/2013 08:35 PM, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
Hi Angelos,
On Sat, 06. Jul 2013 at 20:18:12 +0300, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
What I propose:
1. All the well tested deb files (used in previous OSGeoLive version)
should be moved to Stable.
2. All new packaging should happen in Testing.
3. Move from Testing to Unstable should happen only if there is at least
a working version of the package in Stable. So if something is not
working as expected (like in the postgis case, the previous builds gets
restored within minutes)
Thoughts?
Shouldn't that be unstable => testing => stable?
Jürgen
Hi Jurgen,
Browsing through the packages of the testing ppa:
mapserver rc and beta packages, ossim svn snapshots, mapcache git master
builds etc
So I believe that Unstable is more stable ppa than Testing.
In case it was not meant to be that way, we should introduce a new devel
ppa...
Angelos
--
Angelos Tzotsos
Remote Sensing Laboratory
National Technical University of Athens
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos
_______________________________________________
UbuntuGIS mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu
http://trac.osgeo.org/ubuntugis/wiki
