On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Caleb Howland <[email protected]>wrote:
> I guess my point is that if we don't regularly hold meetings, we might > lapse into an eternal state of inactivity. Just saying. Even if we hold > them infrequently, say twice a month, we still should anyway. > > Caleb Howland > > I am definitely NOT against this idea because that was 'my' idea months ago but I ended up sending emails, asking for meetings and all what I got so far was one meeting for the Marketing and Communications Team and one very short meeting with one member of the Wiki Team. And, months ago, one other meeting with Tim and another developer who has left the project. I've been around since July 2013 with only 3 meetings? hmm, that is definitely not what I wanted :) That said, +1 for daily meetings if we have to but again, aren't we wasting time discussing about meetings that never happened except very few times? Maybe this latest proposal could solve this issue? https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-gnome/2014-February/001547.html I don't know, what do you think? > StartUbuntu Project > Ubuntu GNOME Comms > Lubuntu Comms > > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-comms > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-comms > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > -- Remember: "All of us are smarter than any one of us." Best Regards, amjjawad <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/amjjawad> Areas of Involvement <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/amjjawad/AreasOfInvolvement> My Projects <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/amjjawad/Projects>
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-comms Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-comms More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
