In deed, last round of updates seems to have Ubuntu GNOME working OK again:
Commit Log for Tue Feb 18 00:08:16 2014
Removed the following packages:
libgjs0d
Upgraded the following packages:
displayconfig (3.10.3-0ubuntu1~trusty1) to 3.10.3-0ubuntu1~trusty2
evolution (3.10.3-0ubuntu4) to 3.10.3-0ubuntu5~trusty1
evolution-common (3.10.3-0ubuntu4) to 3.10.3-0ubuntu5~trusty1
evolution-plugins (3.10.3-0ubuntu4) to 3.10.3-0ubuntu5~trusty1
gjs (1.38.1-0ubuntu2) to 1.39.3-0ubuntu2
gnome-shell (3.10.3-0ubuntu2) to 3.10.3-0ubuntu3
gnome-shell-common (3.10.3-0ubuntu2) to 3.10.3-0ubuntu3
gnome-sushi (3.10.0-1ubuntu1) to 3.10.0-1ubuntu2
libevolution (3.10.3-0ubuntu4) to 3.10.3-0ubuntu5~trusty1
libunity-control-center1 (14.04.2-0ubuntu2~trusty2) to 14.04.3-0ubuntu1
python-gi (3.11.5-0ubuntu1) to 3.11.90-0ubuntu1
python-gi-cairo (3.11.5-0ubuntu1) to 3.11.90-0ubuntu1
python-gobject (3.11.5-0ubuntu1) to 3.11.90-0ubuntu1
python3-gi (3.11.5-0ubuntu1) to 3.11.90-0ubuntu1
python3-gi-cairo (3.11.5-0ubuntu1) to 3.11.90-0ubuntu1
ubuntu-minimal (1.318) to 1.319
ubuntu-standard (1.318) to 1.319
Installed the following packages:
libgjs0e (1.39.3-0ubuntu2)
libmozjs-24-0 (24.2.0-0ubuntu2)
I'll follow up on Edubuntu soon.
Lance
________________________________
From: Tim <t...@feathertop.org>
To: Lance <lbsol...@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Ubuntugnome-qa] Fwd: [Call for testing] gnome-desktop 3.10
also a number of packages have been outdated in that ppa now, which could cause
problems :(
On 18/02/14 11:02, Lance wrote:
Rough going. It seems that X is broken in Edubuntu flashback-metacity with
those packages, at least both the keyboard and mouse are non functional.
>
>In Ubuntu GNOME the standard DE loads very slowly and a crash
appears but can't be reported, although it does indicate the
problem is with 'gnome-settings-daemon'.
>
>Lance
>
>
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
> From: Erick Brunzell <lbsol...@yahoo.com>
>To: Tim <t...@feathertop.org>; Ubuntu GNOME
><ubuntugnome-qa@lists.launchpad.net>
>Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 3:56 AM
>Subject: Re: [Ubuntugnome-qa] Fwd: [Call for testing] gnome-desktop 3.10
>
>
>
>On 02/17/2014 03:31 AM, Tim wrote:
>
>Hey Lance,
>>
>>On 17/02/14 20:23, Erick Brunzell wrote:
>>
>>On 02/17/2014 02:39 AM, Tim wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hey All,
>>>> See below call for testing, mainly looking
for testing against Unity or other non-shell
DE's that use gnome-settings-daemon and
gnome-control-center.
>>>>
>>>>This will unblock 3.10 updates of above apps
if we can get this landed, so all testing is
appreciated!
>>>>
>>>>Thanks
>>>> Tim
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-------- Original Message --------
>>>>Subject: [Call for testing] gnome-desktop 3.10
>>>>Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:07:22 +1100
>>>>From: Tim <dark...@fastmail.fm>
>>>>To: ubuntu-desk...@lists.ubuntu.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hi all, I have prepared a ppa to test gnome-desktop update. This implements
>>>>a new daemon which mimics, what mutter what normally do for the display
config and idle monitor. Currently only know issue is that the
"monitors-changed" signal does not propagate through to
gnome|unity-control-center if the resolution is
changed directly by Xrandr. Please test and let me know if you spot any bugs.
ppa:darkxst/gnome-desktop Thanks Tim --
ubuntu-desktop mailing list ubuntu-desk...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
Hi Tim,
>>>
>>>No problem, well maybe slow going because I have
to care for an ill dog, but that shouldn't be a
huge problem. I do however have some stupid
questions as usual :^(
>>>
>>>I'll need to start with fresh installs anyway
since those I have right now have been tweaked too
much. That's OK but before I start I'd like to
know if any other PPA should be in use along with
that?
>>>
>>>My best guess is NO, but I want to be sure.
>>>
Yeh clean install and just that PPA is best.
>>
>>
>>>So my plan would be to install the i386 versions
of Ubuntu, Edubuntu, and Ubuntu GNOME. Then
install this PPA:
>>>
>>>https://launchpad.net/~darkxst/+archive/gnome-desktop/+index?field.series_filter=
>>>
>>>Would that be sufficient or would I also need to
test the amd64 versions?
>>>
I don't imagine there would be any arch specific issue with these changes, so
just i386 fine.
>>
>>
>>>Do any other flavors need to be tested?
>>>
Not directly
>>
>>
>>>If so I'm really unfamiliar ATM with Xubuntu,
Lubuntu, and Kubuntu.
>>>
>>>I've also never used 'cheese', 'epiphany-browser',
or 'evolution' so you should be aware of that.
>>>
those packages are just rebuilds for the library bump, main things to look out
for a display config, i.e. changing display setups and idle monitor (activation
of screensaver etc on idle)
>>
>>Thanks
>> Tim
>>
>>
>>
Cool, using zsync now so I can start with fresh installs.
>
>Must also catch some sleep but I should have some
results within 24 hours.
>
>Lance
>
>--
>Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-qa
>Post to : ubuntugnome-qa@lists.launchpad.net
>Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-qa
>More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-qa
Post to : ubuntugnome-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-qa
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp