64 bytes from cg-in-f100.google.com (209.85.171.100): icmp_seq=43 ttl=240 time=79.4 ms 64 bytes from cg-in-f100.google.com (209.85.171.100): icmp_seq=44 ttl=240 time=84.3 ms 64 bytes from cg-in-f100.google.com (209.85.171.100): icmp_seq=45 ttl=240 time=79.8 ms 64 bytes from cg-in-f100.google.com (209.85.171.100): icmp_seq=46 ttl=240 time=77.7 ms 64 bytes from cg-in-f100.google.com (209.85.171.100): icmp_seq=47 ttl=240 time=81.9 ms 64 bytes from cg-in-f100.google.com (209.85.171.100): icmp_seq=48 ttl=240 time=80.1 ms 64 bytes from cg-in-f100.google.com (209.85.171.100): icmp_seq=49 ttl=240 time=78.7 ms 64 bytes from cg-in-f100.google.com (209.85.171.100): icmp_seq=50 ttl=240 time=80.2 ms 64 bytes from cg-in-f100.google.com (209.85.171.100): icmp_seq=51 ttl=240 time=81.1 ms 64 bytes from cg-in-f100.google.com (209.85.171.100): icmp_seq=52 ttl=240 time=79.9 ms 64 bytes from cg-in-f100.google.com (209.85.171.100): icmp_seq=53 ttl=240 time=80.3 ms 64 bytes from cg-in-f100.google.com (209.85.171.100): icmp_seq=54 ttl=240 time=81.5 ms 64 bytes from cg-in-f100.google.com (209.85.171.100): icmp_seq=55 ttl=240 time=3374 ms <=================== 64 bytes from cg-in-f100.google.com (209.85.171.100): icmp_seq=59 ttl=240 time=81.4 ms 64 bytes from cg-in-f100.google.com (209.85.171.100): icmp_seq=60 ttl=240 time=84.5 ms 64 bytes from cg-in-f100.google.com (209.85.171.100): icmp_seq=61 ttl=240 time=79.4 ms 64 bytes from cg-in-f100.google.com (209.85.171.100): icmp_seq=62 ttl=240 time=77.9 ms 64 bytes from cg-in-f100.google.com (209.85.171.100): icmp_seq=63 ttl=240 time=78.8 ms 64 bytes from cg-in-f100.google.com (209.85.171.100): icmp_seq=64 ttl=240 time=80.3 ms 64 bytes from cg-in-f100.google.com (209.85.171.100): icmp_seq=65 ttl=240 time=80.6 ms 64 bytes from cg-in-f100.google.com (209.85.171.100): icmp_seq=66 ttl=240 time=78.7 ms 64 bytes from cg-in-f100.google.com (209.85.171.100): icmp_seq=67 ttl=240 time=80.8 ms 64 bytes from cg-in-f100.google.com (209.85.171.100): icmp_seq=68 ttl=240 time=80.7 ms 64 bytes from cg-in-f100.google.com (209.85.171.100): icmp_seq=69 ttl=240 time=80.0 ms 64 bytes from cg-in-f100.google.com (209.85.171.100): icmp_seq=70 ttl=240 time=80.3 ms 64 bytes from cg-in-f100.google.com (209.85.171.100): icmp_seq=71 ttl=240 time=79.4 ms
On Jan 26, 3:14 pm, Mike <[email protected]> wrote: > My wifi adapter is working fine, however every minute or two (I havn't > timed it) on a regular basis I get a lag spike which causes packet > loss in Everquest 2 lasting for a duration of about 3 seconds. For > normal everyday use this is not a problem, however as a gamer, 3 > seconds is a long long time. > > On windows this exact same behaviour was seen on this card and was > corrected by using the application WLANOptimizer(1), which essentially > disabled vista's automatic search for networks on a regular interval. > My question is, can I duplicate this behaviour somehow in Linux? > > Mike > > (1)http://www.martin-majowski.de/wlanoptimizer/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ubuntu Linux" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ubuntulinux?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
