On May 15, 2013 12:29 PM, "Jonathan Riddell" <[email protected]> wrote: > needing to kill and start a new graphics server is a new requirement > and quite a user-unfriendly one, it would need thinking how to make it > as elegant as possible.
Yes but that's the worst-case. Ideally LightDM would be the one display manager that supports *everything*. I mean already GNOME doesn't work as well without GDM but that's not really Canonical's fault. > > And the flavor community may need to depend on Debian instead of Canonical > > to maintain X and Wayland? > > Yes but Canonical already patches mesa and X to suit Unity making bugs > appear in at least KWin exclusively on Kubuntu, this is likely to > increase. What if Debian is frozen? Maybe less patching of X would be needed? Of course past experience tells us that Qt patching will increase as Ubuntu uses it more. > Feel free to take this to ubuntu-devel, I was thinking a vUDS session > would be a good way to start the discussion but probably I was too late for that. Sorry I don't have the time now to champion this discussion. Thanks Jeremy
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
