On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Jeremy Bicha <[email protected]> wrote:
> On May 15, 2013 12:29 PM, "Jonathan Riddell" <[email protected]> wrote: > > needing to kill and start a new graphics server is a new requirement > > and quite a user-unfriendly one, it would need thinking how to make it > > as elegant as possible. > > Yes but that's the worst-case. Ideally LightDM would be the one display > manager that supports *everything*. I mean already GNOME doesn't work as > well without GDM but that's not really Canonical's fault. > > > > And the flavor community may need to depend on Debian instead of > Canonical > > > to maintain X and Wayland? > > > > Yes but Canonical already patches mesa and X to suit Unity making bugs > > appear in at least KWin exclusively on Kubuntu, this is likely to > > increase. What if Debian is frozen? > > Maybe less patching of X would be needed? Of course past experience tells > us that Qt patching will increase as Ubuntu uses it more. > Are the patches such that we can pick and choose to maintain Mesa-kubuntu or Mesa-basic or so? My understanding was that if the patches aren't upstreamable, then they are kept in a branch so can't we just cherry pick what we like? (yes, spoken by a true non-dev...) > > Feel free to take this to ubuntu-devel, I was thinking a vUDS session > > would be a good way to start the discussion but probably I was too late > for that. > > Sorry I don't have the time now to champion this discussion. > > Thanks > Jeremy > Overall, I'd like to see this talked about at vUDS, even though I'm travelling and likely will have little input myself. Jussi > > -- > kubuntu-devel mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel > >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
